Select Page

Enhancing Engineering Efficiency Through Crowdtesting

In software engineering and testing, efficiency is key. Speed and efficiency, however, are not necessarily synonymous, especially not at scale.

Automated testing, while useful, often falls short in the big picture, which leads to higher costs and a narrower testing scope. Engineers frequently spend more time maintaining automated tests than writing new code, hardly the best use of their talents.

So, what’s a better answer for efficiency gains? Crowdtesting offers a powerful solution that leverages a global community of testers to enhance software quality, reduce technical debt and free up engineering resources for more critical tasks. Let’s walk through how crowdtesting fits within modern dev environments and unlocks efficiency gains.

The Role of Crowdtesting in Modern DevOps

In modern DevOps toolchains, the tools should ultimately improve the process. If tools get in the way or introduce friction, they’re immediately counterintuitive to the objective of DevOps. When done with an experienced partner, crowdtesting integrates seamlessly into the DevOps pipeline, both early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and in production environments.

By shifting left — testing earlier in the development process — crowdtesting helps serve as the first line of defense, enabling organizations to identify issues before they become costly problems. Automated testing typically focuses on catching bugs during the later stages of development, often leading to delays and higher remediation costs. Implementing crowdtesting at various stages, from development to pre-production, introduces an external perspective on your digital products, ensuring a broader range of issues are identified and resolved early.

When organizations offload some of the testing responsibilities to crowdtesters, engineering experiences efficiency gains by focusing on unit tests and core development. This division of labor not only demonstrably improves the quality of the code but also speeds up the development process — speed and quality both improve.

Organizations can integrate crowdtesting seamlessly into existing CI/CD pipelines, basically whenever the product is stable enough to use. As code progresses through various stages — QA1, QA2 and pre-prod — crowdtesters can run smoke tests and other checks to ensure each stage is stable before moving to the next.

By shifting right — in production environments — organizations gain insights into how the product works in the hands of actual users. For too many DevOps organizations, feedback mechanisms rely heavily on telemetry data, with metrics that track performance, usage statistics and automated alerts from tools like PagerDuty. However, these tools often lack perspectives from real users, such as usability issues and functional defects that trigger crashes or suboptimal performances in real-world environments.

Crowdtesting provides real-time feedback from actual users that match target customer personas, helping to capture nuanced issues faster than telemetry — if the telemetry catches the issue at all. For instance, while telemetry can indicate a system crash, it might not report a critical usability flaw that frustrates users.

E-Books

3 Ways Your Users' Feedback Can Boost Your Bottom Line

In this walkthrough, gain insight into how Applause can deliver real-time feedback into the quality of your digital experiences.

In the case of Applause's global crowdtesting model, our digital experts return feedback as quickly as 2 to 4 hours, compared to the days or weeks it might take for telemetry-based feedback to surface. This rapid turnaround helps teams address issues swiftly, as opposed to one of the two ways issues typically surface:

  • Tech support eventually discovers the issue from a customer, which might or might not be handled immediately, depending on their alignment with engineering, potentially leading to further delays.
  • Customers share the issue publicly on social channels or app reviews, causing damage to the brand reputation.

In an age where churn is high and word spreads rapidly, there is a real and direct cost of poor experiences.

Benefits of Crowdtesting in DevOps

DevOps aims to improve collaboration between development and operations teams, automate workflows and deliver software faster and more reliably. The outcome that many DevOps organizations hope to achieve is seamless, high-quality and continuously improving software as a result of fewer bugs reaching production and faster feature updates.

Crowdtesting ultimately helps achieve these outcomes in the following ways.

  1. Increased efficiency and focus - Crowdtesting enables engineering teams to concentrate on their primary tasks by outsourcing to a diverse group of testers. These testers validate various user environments and use cases, uncovering issues that might elude internal QA professionals in a controlled testing environment. By prioritizing defects the crowd found based on severity and impact, engineering teams can quickly act on these critical issues, reducing the defect backlog and preventing the accumulation of technical debt. This aligns with DevOps principles by streamlining workflows, minimizing distractions from core tasks and ensuring that teams maintain focus on developing new and improved features.
  2. Improved feedback loop - Crowdtesting ensures faster identification and resolution of defects via the global crowd. Unlike traditional telemetry, which often delays issue detection until after deployment, crowdtesting offers proactive and rapid insights into the user experience and functional issues during the development cycle. Real-time feedback loops allow for quicker iterations and more responsive development processes. By integrating crowdtesting into the DevOps process, teams can continuously test and refine their products, maintaining high standards of quality and user satisfaction, a fundamental goal of DevOps.
  3. Reduced technical debt - Early defect detection through crowdtesting minimizes long-term technical debt. By identifying and addressing issues during the development cycle, teams can prevent the accumulation of unresolved defects that can slow down future development efforts, either through devs repairing code or indirectly through infrastructure or third-party issues. This proactive approach allows teams to maintain a cleaner codebase and avoid the compounded costs of fixing defects later in the development process. Crowdtesting complements automated testing already in use by the organization by catching additional defects, edge cases and user experience issues, ensuring comprehensive coverage. This approach aligns with DevOps practices, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a sustainable and efficient development environment.
  4. Enhanced usability - Crowdtesting captures user experience issues that telemetry might miss, especially when led by experienced UX researchers that can source targeted participants and analyze findings. By involving real users in the testing process, organizations can ensure that the product not only functions correctly but also provides a satisfying user experience. This human-centric approach helps identify and address subtle usability issues that automated tests fail to detect, such as navigation difficulties, layout inconsistencies and points of friction. Ensuring a positive user experience is critical for product adoption and retention, and aligns with DevOps practices that prioritize customer satisfaction and product quality.

The Applause Difference

Crowdtesting with Applause offers a myriad of benefits for DevOps and engineering teams, from enhanced efficiency and reduced technical debt to improved user perception. By integrating a strategic crowdtesting approach in the DevOps pipeline, teams can catch issues early, reduce distractions and ultimately deliver higher quality products — all aligning with the fundamental principles of the approach.

In fact, a recent IDC report indicated Applause customers realized substantial efficiency benefits by working with Applause, including:

  • 681 hours of staff time saved per release.
  • 13% higher dev team productivity.
  • Average annual benefit of $1,620,400 in testing staff efficiencies.

Let’s chat today to explore how crowdtesting can enhance your development process and deliver wins with customers.

Apps targeting young people

Naturally, banks and online brokers are also increasingly offering mobile solutions for stock trading. However, this new group of fintech startups has a different structure than traditional providers. As international apps with social media appeal, they are aimed at a particularly young target group of 25- to 35-year-olds who want not only access to stock trading but also a new kind of user experience. It has become clear that accessibility and user-friendliness are key selling points for these new investment apps. For example, according to Bitkom’s Digital Finance Report 2020, 40% of respondents expressed the expectation that “smartphone apps’ ease of use for stock and securities transactions will enable more people to benefit from companies’ performances.”

In a nutshell, the easy access via smartphones makes these “neobrokers” so appealing. Clear design, community integration, and ease of entry has turned UI/UX into an actual product.

Special opportunities – special risks?

Many apps have little to no limit on how small a trade can be, making it possible to buy fractional shares. As mentioned, they charge very low fees — or none at all — and are available outside of regular trading hours. The apps clearly aim to lower the entry threshold for stock trading, and sometimes lure new users with free shares. On the flip side, the apps offer no or minimal investing advice, unlike traditional brokers. Consequently, purchasers must do their own research outside of the app, using articles, forums and social media. This aspect has raised suspicions in the German market. In the survey undertaken for the Bitkom Digital Finance Report referenced above, 69% of respondents stated that “an advisor’s input is absolutely key to making good investment decisions.” As a result, the separation of professional advisory services and the gamification of trading stocks carries certain risks, especially for inexperienced users.

Too much power?

The potential dynamics unleashed by direct market access were demonstrated in an interesting case study in January. Small investors coordinated a purchase of GameStop stock via Reddit to prevent a decline in the company’s value, on which hedge funds had speculated. In fact, the Reddit community’s actions were so successful that U.S. authorities are now investigating the possibility of market manipulation. Outrage erupted, however, when Robinhood simply suspended trading in GameStop shares at the height of the buying frenzy.

Ultimately, the neobroker did have a good reason for halting trading. The security it had deposited with clearinghouse DTCC was insufficient to match increased trading volume. However, this episode illustrates that some luster has fallen from the new market power of small investors: Even trading apps do not eliminate the intermediary function; they only replace it, sometimes with even more opaque conditions than before.

The outlook is promising

And yet, neobrokers are attracting young investors by reinventing the process of investing and stock trading. With pleasing designs and customer experiences geared toward millennials, these apps will be able to gain many users in the next few years. At that point, they will have to show that they can keep up with the momentum that they created. Users expect apps, acting as financial service providers and managers of highly sensitive data, to be error-free at all times and in all places – and rightly so. User trust and compliance with financial rules will play a crucial role in determining whether neobrokers will remain competitive as market penetration continues.

However, the new investment apps’ penetration of the DACH market is still at an early stage. Established providers, especially banking apps, may leverage the trend by incorporating a more attractive UX and simplified investment features into their existing apps. For example, a whitepaper from the Sparkassen Innovation Hub on the topic of changing values recommends “opening up products to small investment amounts” as well as “using a clear, appealing interface (UI), playful elements for data entry and maintenance, [and] the use of status and progress indicators to guide users through processes” to attract a new group of potential investors.

One thing is certain: The phenomenal growth of investment and trading apps, especially in Germany, could be a precursor to interesting developments in the coming years.

Michael Giacometti, Applause
Michael Giacometti
Strategic Solutions Consultant, Applause
Published On: July 24, 2024
Reading Time: 6 min

Avoiding The Hidden Cost of Payment Failures

Learn how you can improve your payment experience and protect revenue across markets, methods, and moments.

Claude Code Crash Course: How to Master Claude Code for QA Engineering

Discover how you can use Claude Code to safely implement AI tools and skills to accelerate your testing lifecycle.

Why Test Plans Fail in the Real World

Your current test strategy might be the reason products fail. Find out why test plans must be adaptable.

How to Conduct AI Evals: Best Practices for Building AI Confidence

Discover why AI evals are crucial for releasing with confidence and get best practices for improving AI system performance.

Crowdtesting vs. System Integrators

Compare system integrator testing with managed crowdtesting services to find the right QA approach for real-world digital quality.

EU AI Act: A Practical Guide for QA Leaders

See how the EU AI Act affects QA and product leaders — and how to adapt testing workflows ahead of compliance deadlines.
No results found.
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.