Select Page

Why Merging DesignOps and DevOps Benefits the Whole Org

The DevOps movement brought broad changes along with it. Not only did DevOps change development team roles, but it also introduced a method to eliminate department silos while increasing team collaboration — no more simply handing projects over the wall piece by piece. With DevOps, the entire team became responsible for getting the application release to the finish line successfully.

Organizations follow the DevOps method when they need to increase development speed, product quality, team collaboration and profitability. DevOps enables role sharing or role variances while the team works on development, testing, release deployment and implementation. The old department islands where developers code and design, then the QA team tests, developers deploy release code and operations handle the customer implementations at their peril, those are gone. DevOps follows a shared responsibility model that enables for higher-quality design and testing for improved user experience and application quality.

Like DevOps, DesignOps is a shared responsibility method of team management. DesignOps brings UI/UX design team members into the DevOps team model. Let’s discuss what DesignOps means, why it’s important and tips to merge DesignOps into DevOps.

What is DesignOps?

DesignOps is a method of team management. DesignOps standardizes team design processes, documentation and business practices to improve communication, collaboration and user experience. Standardizing application design sounds boring, but DesignOps ultimately results in happier, more collaborative teams. The approach provides team organization and functional principles that help manage the team’s work in a productive and effective manner.

DesignOps addresses team management challenges:

  • team growth

  • hiring designers with the desired skills

  • creating efficient, organized business processes or workflows

  • improving the quality of team deliverables for greater impact

DesignOps brings the UI/UX designer into the project from the beginning through the end. By enveloping them into the DevOps team, designers learn to work alongside development to implement workable designs into the existing technical architecture. Without merging DesignOps and DevOps, the designers remain isolated; this makes collaboration efforts ineffective — or outright disastrous.

Designers and developers have different skill sets. Designers are artistic. While there is an art to coding, developers are technical, and base their code on existing code and architecture. There’s nothing that wastes more developer and designer time than receiving designs that cannot or should not be implemented.

Benefits of DesignOps

Merging DevOps and DesignOps benefits the design team as well as the company overall. DesignOps benefits include more consistent design practices and processes, tool usage and workflows. Companies can also more easily scale UI/UX design. Combined DesignOps and DevOps put the focus not only on quality design, but on efficiency, business impact and collaboration with the development team.

One top DesignOps benefit is standardization. As teams and products grow in complexity and numbers, the organization’s teams must scale to keep up with the business pace. Consistent design output enables all team members to know what the UI/UX designer provides in their work and what tool sets are used to create the designs.

Additional DesignOps benefits include giving designers input into application development as well as the overall business strategy and objectives. More voices and eyes on application development and design throughout the project create a higher quality customer experience with the resulting application. It also helps align the design with broader business goals.

When combining DevOps and DesignOps, UI/UX designers become involved and included with the DevOps team end to end. Inclusion fosters increased collaboration and innovation, which improves employee loyalty, product quality and team productivity.

Why use DesignOps with DevOps?

Hybridization causes increased vigor, meaning teams become more powerful together than they are separate.

Both DevOps and DesignOps methods intend to solve the following problems:

  • siloed departmental functions

  • lack of team communication or collaboration

  • disconnectedness from the customer experience

  • complications — or chaos — on large, complex projects.

By reducing the barriers between teams and merging them, the organization as a whole becomes more unified. Additionally, communication and feedback between teams improve, and the result is a better product, delivered with higher quality at a faster pace.

Merging DesignOps and DevOps begins by preserving the principles of each practice but adjusting them to meet both groups’ needs. With a merged DesignOps-DevOps team, the teams can eliminate unnecessary re-work, bottlenecks and delays caused by misunderstandings. Coordinating workflows improves the flow of sprint and iteration work, and it gets the team closer to delivering improved user experience at a more rapid pace.

Sounds wonderful, but how do you get there?

Most UI/UX designers and developers don’t tend to share the same knowledge — one understands the user experience and design standards, the other understands code standards and practices. Knowledge gaps typically result in miscommunication that wastes time. By merging teams, UX designers learn to understand the existing code architecture while developers build their knowledge of UX design.

Of course, understanding code infrastructure, requirements and restrictions take time. Investing the time will save countless hours of frustration when designers toil for days on a design only to find out the product can’t be built that way.

In the same way, developers tend to be logical and literal. If they can implement the design, they will, even when the design was only meant to convey a concept. Developers are most productive when the design is part of all discussions on products and features, so any framework restrictions are clear before designs are created. DesignOps and DevOps collaboration ensures the team members understand both the purpose and importance of the design for user experience.

Tips for Implementing DesignOps with DevOps

What can be done to merge DesignOps and DevOps? First, bring the teams together either organizationally or by involving them in meetings and reviews relevant to the project.

Consider pairing designers and developers upfront when working on features. This dev-design pairing enables collaborative input during the coding process. Designers can display and explain their design requests, while developers can explain which designs are possible or not. They can come up with a solution together that still serves the user experience.

It might help illustrate the design’s intent to create a coded prototype to display the functional design. Many design tools allow for design prototypes to simulate functions to show the intent without the need to build the underlying code.

Most importantly, emphasize that the team should focus on the customer behavior or user experience goal for the feature, not the precise feature functionality. When you focus on the business goal or customer goal, adjustments to the feature are then made collaboratively to meet that shared goal.

Podcasts

UX Metrics That Actually Make Sense

Some businesses have no clue how to measure the user experience — and it shows. In this episode of the Ready, Test, Go. podcast, we talk about how to build UX awareness from the ground up.

Other options for merging DesignOps and DevOps include:

  • adding UX designers to the product development team, and including them in all story or sprint planning and design discussions

  • including UX design tasks within the work tracking tool, sprint or Kanban board for visibility

  • sharing current user experience ratings, and establishing a goal to improve upon it

  • encouraging developers, QA testers and other development team members to participate in design and code reviews, which ultimately improves innovation and productivity.

The goal of merging DesignOps and DevOps enables effective collaboration and improved design within all phases of application development. More standardization in the design process helps the teams work together more cohesively and create an application that customers want to experience.

Modern applications need exceptional user experiences to succeed. Positive user experience has finally moved into the forefront, and it is now more important than ever for application development organizations. Without a positive user experience, the application is doomed to fail. Ignoring user experience is no longer an option. Get your team moving forward together by merging DesignOps and DevOps.

Ebooks

Shift Left and Build Empathy Through Inclusive Design

Companies need to build their products by working closely with all persons from the start — PwD and non-disabled. It ensures an equitable experience for all…and benefits everyone.

Apps targeting young people

Naturally, banks and online brokers are also increasingly offering mobile solutions for stock trading. However, this new group of fintech startups has a different structure than traditional providers. As international apps with social media appeal, they are aimed at a particularly young target group of 25- to 35-year-olds who want not only access to stock trading but also a new kind of user experience. It has become clear that accessibility and user-friendliness are key selling points for these new investment apps. For example, according to Bitkom’s Digital Finance Report 2020, 40% of respondents expressed the expectation that “smartphone apps’ ease of use for stock and securities transactions will enable more people to benefit from companies’ performances.”

In a nutshell, the easy access via smartphones makes these “neobrokers” so appealing. Clear design, community integration, and ease of entry has turned UI/UX into an actual product.

Special opportunities – special risks?

Many apps have little to no limit on how small a trade can be, making it possible to buy fractional shares. As mentioned, they charge very low fees — or none at all — and are available outside of regular trading hours. The apps clearly aim to lower the entry threshold for stock trading, and sometimes lure new users with free shares. On the flip side, the apps offer no or minimal investing advice, unlike traditional brokers. Consequently, purchasers must do their own research outside of the app, using articles, forums and social media. This aspect has raised suspicions in the German market. In the survey undertaken for the Bitkom Digital Finance Report referenced above, 69% of respondents stated that “an advisor’s input is absolutely key to making good investment decisions.” As a result, the separation of professional advisory services and the gamification of trading stocks carries certain risks, especially for inexperienced users.

Too much power?

The potential dynamics unleashed by direct market access were demonstrated in an interesting case study in January. Small investors coordinated a purchase of GameStop stock via Reddit to prevent a decline in the company’s value, on which hedge funds had speculated. In fact, the Reddit community’s actions were so successful that U.S. authorities are now investigating the possibility of market manipulation. Outrage erupted, however, when Robinhood simply suspended trading in GameStop shares at the height of the buying frenzy.

Ultimately, the neobroker did have a good reason for halting trading. The security it had deposited with clearinghouse DTCC was insufficient to match increased trading volume. However, this episode illustrates that some luster has fallen from the new market power of small investors: Even trading apps do not eliminate the intermediary function; they only replace it, sometimes with even more opaque conditions than before.

The outlook is promising

And yet, neobrokers are attracting young investors by reinventing the process of investing and stock trading. With pleasing designs and customer experiences geared toward millennials, these apps will be able to gain many users in the next few years. At that point, they will have to show that they can keep up with the momentum that they created. Users expect apps, acting as financial service providers and managers of highly sensitive data, to be error-free at all times and in all places – and rightly so. User trust and compliance with financial rules will play a crucial role in determining whether neobrokers will remain competitive as market penetration continues.

However, the new investment apps’ penetration of the DACH market is still at an early stage. Established providers, especially banking apps, may leverage the trend by incorporating a more attractive UX and simplified investment features into their existing apps. For example, a whitepaper from the Sparkassen Innovation Hub on the topic of changing values recommends “opening up products to small investment amounts” as well as “using a clear, appealing interface (UI), playful elements for data entry and maintenance, [and] the use of status and progress indicators to guide users through processes” to attract a new group of potential investors.

One thing is certain: The phenomenal growth of investment and trading apps, especially in Germany, could be a precursor to interesting developments in the coming years.

Amy Reichert
Amy Reichert
Freelance QA SME/Test Engineer
Published On: November 8, 2022
Reading Time: 7 min

Avoiding The Hidden Cost of Payment Failures

Learn how you can improve your payment experience and protect revenue across markets, methods, and moments.

Claude Code Crash Course: How to Master Claude Code for QA Engineering

Discover how you can use Claude Code to safely implement AI tools and skills to accelerate your testing lifecycle.

Why Test Plans Fail in the Real World

Your current test strategy might be the reason products fail. Find out why test plans must be adaptable.

How to Conduct AI Evals: Best Practices for Building AI Confidence

Discover why AI evals are crucial for releasing with confidence and get best practices for improving AI system performance.

Crowdtesting vs. System Integrators

Compare system integrator testing with managed crowdtesting services to find the right QA approach for real-world digital quality.

EU AI Act: A Practical Guide for QA Leaders

See how the EU AI Act affects QA and product leaders — and how to adapt testing workflows ahead of compliance deadlines.
No results found.
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.