Select Page

Rethink Regression Testing: 3 Reasons to Outsource

While most software engineering teams understand why regression testing is essential, few developers and QA pros enjoy running regression tests. It’s often seen as a necessary evil that slows releases and sucks the soul out of the unlucky testers assigned to do the work. 

As release cycles accelerate and applications become more complex, many teams are also exploring how AI can support regression testing — helping prioritize test coverage, generate test cases, and accelerate execution. However, AI alone cannot fully validate how applications perform in real-world conditions.

Crowdtesting offers organizations an alternative way to carry out regression tests and reduce the burden on internal teams. Here are three great reasons to outsource regression testing to a community-based testing provider.

Maintain the right device coverage

“Every time there's a change in code, whether it's front end or back end, it needs to be tested to determine if that new piece of code impacts something that's already in place. If you don't do that regression testing, generally because of the complexity of systems today, there's going to be a failure somewhere along the line. It might be minor — it might not even be noticed by the average customer. But there's still going to be a challenge or a problem within the system,” said Sim Olsberg, Associate Director, Solution Delivery. 

Those unseen problems with the system can have serious consequences. Highly regulated industries like financial services, healthcare, online gambling and telecommunications can expose themselves to steep penalties if these overlooked defects impact compliance. Testing across a rapidly expanding landscape of devices and OSes is nearly impossible to achieve in a lab setting – particularly for enterprises serving multiple markets, or those where a variety of connected devices come into play.

While AI can help expand the breadth of regression testing by generating additional test cases and identifying high-risk areas, it cannot replicate the variability of real devices, networks, and user environments.

Applause crowdtesting offers on-demand access to the exact combinations of devices and operating systems teams need to test. Applause-run test cases take the burden of  tactical testing off internal QA teams, allowing them to focus on strategic opportunities and reduce burnout. In addition, a fresh set of eyes provides an opportunity for QA testers less familiar with the product, and therefore less likely to naturally slip into “workaround mode,” to put the system through its paces, as it was developed, not as it should be.

Every test case that passes provides peace of mind, while every failure is an opportunity to correct the issue before it causes any significant harm. 

Case Study
How FLOA partners with Applause for regression testing

Find out how FLOA works with Applause to identify high-value bugs, increase its testing capabilities, and release with confidence.

Read the Case Study

Speed release cycles

Some organizations have massive regression testing suites. Even with automation in the mix, thorough testing can take weeks. AI-powered tools can help accelerate regression testing by generating and executing test cases more quickly, and by identifying which areas of the application are most likely to be impacted by code changes.

One company that acts as a centralized IT department for thousands of clients faced significant problems with device coverage due to the varied technical makeups of their client’s networks. They needed to test across Windows, Linux, physical and virtual systems. The IT services firm wanted to push patch management releases more frequently, but was bogged down with a seven week regression testing cycle. 

Applause assembled a pool of testers with the technical skills necessary to cover all the complex scenarios the company needed. By combining scalable human testing with automation and AI-assisted prioritization, the IT services provider was able to reduce regression testing time to three weeks. 

Reallocate internal engineering and QA capacity to more strategic initiatives

Regression testing’s repetitive nature bores most QA pros – and introduces the risk of tester fatigue. While some team members may tolerate a certain amount of regression testing as part of their jobs, too much of it can lead employees to feel like they’re stagnating. QA team attrition and difficulty hiring and onboarding staff adds costs – and extends timelines. Staff turnover can put even greater pressure on teams that are already struggling to meet release deadlines without sacrificing test coverage. 

Working with a crowdtesting provider for regression testing allows internal teams to spend their time on more challenging – and fulfilling – work. Tara Ziegler, Senior Director, Testing Services explained that regression testing is a common use case for Applause. “When we start working with a new client, we look at how they are doing their QA today: all the different things they're doing a lot of,” she said. Applause often takes over large volumes of regression testing and repetitive manual test case execution.

In many cases, Applause helps teams determine which regression tests are best suited for automation or AI-driven execution — and which require human validation — and then manages the execution across both. This ensures the right balance of speed, coverage, and real-world insight as applications evolve.

 “Now their internal QA team can focus on feature testing, or maybe helping with the requirements gathering for new features and advising on that. If they're having to do a lot of repetitive regression testing and that kind of thing, it's difficult to find the time for those higher level tasks,” Ziegler said.

TL; DR: Why outsource regression testing to a crowdtesting partner?

Handing off regression testing to a crowdtesting partner can help teams:

  • Save time by distributing work across a broader team for concurrent tests and starting tests earlier in the sprint cycle
  • Increase coverage across devices, OSes, and different test case scenarios
  • Improve QA staff retention by allowing internal teams to focus on more strategic and engaging work, developing their skills.
  • Combine AI, automation, and human testing to increase speed while maintaining real-world validation

Tired of losing time and talent to lengthy regression testing cycles? Contact us to see how we can help.

Apps targeting young people

Naturally, banks and online brokers are also increasingly offering mobile solutions for stock trading. However, this new group of fintech startups has a different structure than traditional providers. As international apps with social media appeal, they are aimed at a particularly young target group of 25- to 35-year-olds who want not only access to stock trading but also a new kind of user experience. It has become clear that accessibility and user-friendliness are key selling points for these new investment apps. For example, according to Bitkom’s Digital Finance Report 2020, 40% of respondents expressed the expectation that “smartphone apps’ ease of use for stock and securities transactions will enable more people to benefit from companies’ performances.”

In a nutshell, the easy access via smartphones makes these “neobrokers” so appealing. Clear design, community integration, and ease of entry has turned UI/UX into an actual product.

Special opportunities – special risks?

Many apps have little to no limit on how small a trade can be, making it possible to buy fractional shares. As mentioned, they charge very low fees — or none at all — and are available outside of regular trading hours. The apps clearly aim to lower the entry threshold for stock trading, and sometimes lure new users with free shares. On the flip side, the apps offer no or minimal investing advice, unlike traditional brokers. Consequently, purchasers must do their own research outside of the app, using articles, forums and social media. This aspect has raised suspicions in the German market. In the survey undertaken for the Bitkom Digital Finance Report referenced above, 69% of respondents stated that “an advisor’s input is absolutely key to making good investment decisions.” As a result, the separation of professional advisory services and the gamification of trading stocks carries certain risks, especially for inexperienced users.

Too much power?

The potential dynamics unleashed by direct market access were demonstrated in an interesting case study in January. Small investors coordinated a purchase of GameStop stock via Reddit to prevent a decline in the company’s value, on which hedge funds had speculated. In fact, the Reddit community’s actions were so successful that U.S. authorities are now investigating the possibility of market manipulation. Outrage erupted, however, when Robinhood simply suspended trading in GameStop shares at the height of the buying frenzy.

Ultimately, the neobroker did have a good reason for halting trading. The security it had deposited with clearinghouse DTCC was insufficient to match increased trading volume. However, this episode illustrates that some luster has fallen from the new market power of small investors: Even trading apps do not eliminate the intermediary function; they only replace it, sometimes with even more opaque conditions than before.

The outlook is promising

And yet, neobrokers are attracting young investors by reinventing the process of investing and stock trading. With pleasing designs and customer experiences geared toward millennials, these apps will be able to gain many users in the next few years. At that point, they will have to show that they can keep up with the momentum that they created. Users expect apps, acting as financial service providers and managers of highly sensitive data, to be error-free at all times and in all places – and rightly so. User trust and compliance with financial rules will play a crucial role in determining whether neobrokers will remain competitive as market penetration continues.

However, the new investment apps’ penetration of the DACH market is still at an early stage. Established providers, especially banking apps, may leverage the trend by incorporating a more attractive UX and simplified investment features into their existing apps. For example, a whitepaper from the Sparkassen Innovation Hub on the topic of changing values recommends “opening up products to small investment amounts” as well as “using a clear, appealing interface (UI), playful elements for data entry and maintenance, [and] the use of status and progress indicators to guide users through processes” to attract a new group of potential investors.

One thing is certain: The phenomenal growth of investment and trading apps, especially in Germany, could be a precursor to interesting developments in the coming years.

Want to see more like this?
Jennifer Waltner
Jennifer Waltner
Director, Global Content Marketing
Published On: February 26, 2026
Reading Time: 5 min

Avoiding The Hidden Cost of Payment Failures

Learn how you can improve your payment experience and protect revenue across markets, methods, and moments.

Claude Code Crash Course: How to Master Claude Code for QA Engineering

Discover how you can use Claude Code to safely implement AI tools and skills to accelerate your testing lifecycle.

Why Test Plans Fail in the Real World

Your current test strategy might be the reason products fail. Find out why test plans must be adaptable.

How to Conduct AI Evals: Best Practices for Building AI Confidence

Discover why AI evals are crucial for releasing with confidence and get best practices for improving AI system performance.

Crowdtesting vs. System Integrators

Compare system integrator testing with managed crowdtesting services to find the right QA approach for real-world digital quality.

EU AI Act: A Practical Guide for QA Leaders

See how the EU AI Act affects QA and product leaders — and how to adapt testing workflows ahead of compliance deadlines.
No results found.
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.